<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 23/04/2012 4:04 PM, Euan de Kock wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:2md3rf.m2xafl.2zc97d-qmf@nschwcmgw05p"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div id="fenix-user-content">
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px;
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;">Hi
James,</p>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px;
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;">Can we
talk about the microphones this evening. I think we can drop
down the shure range a bit. Maybe the PG or PGX range.</p>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px;
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;">Speak
to you tonight,</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
That's true; the PGX is VHF, which is more prone to interference and
less compatible with parallel systems. The recommendation for the
receiver to transmitter is 5m or less; not a problem if we're
parking the receiver under the presenters table and connected to the
XLR snake! The microphone option may remain the same; the saving
becomes $100 for the PGX reciever and bodypack, and the equivalent
PGX handheld is $165 cheaper. But we've saved more than that on the
mixer, boundaries, and laptops. Hence I'm all for getting the good
kit for the extra $265! ;)<br>
<br>
But we'll discuss tonight over a nice drink. :)<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<em>Mobile:</em> +61 422 166 708, <em>Email:</em>
james_AT_rcpt.to<br>
PLUG President 2012: <a href="http//www.plug.org.au">http://www.plug.org.au</a></div>
</body>
</html>