Hi Kai,<br><br>Long time no talk. Yeah in my opinion it is pretty standard, however I typically achieve more than 1 month before something goes wrong. We have some 2008 R2 servers that have been up for 3 months, only reason being is because that was the last time I did a patchathon. One is coming up in the next few weeks.<br>
<br>On the other hand, I have an IBM T43 laptop at my house running Debian. Check out the uptime:<br><br> 17:04:20 up 404 days, 2:43, 3 users, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01<br><br><a href="http://bonez.me/phpsysinfo">http://bonez.me/phpsysinfo</a><br>
<br>It's a 6-7 year old laptop...<br><br>Cheers<br>Blake<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 14 March 2012 16:51, Daniel Pearson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:daniel@flashware.net">daniel@flashware.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Calibri">With desktops, yes. However think about it ;
especially in an environment where a SOE exists. 6+ hours trying
to fix a machine vs 2 hours to re-image.<br>
<br>
</font><div class="im">
<div><font face="Calibri">Regards,<br>
<b>Daniel Pearson</b><br>
<font color="Red" size="1">Flashware Solutions Ltd</font><br>
<font size="1">London, UK / Perth, AU / Guinea & Liberia
(West Africa)<br>
<a href="tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207857%20147%20620" value="+447857147620" target="_blank">+44 (0) 7857 147 620</a> | <a href="mailto:daniel@flashware.net" target="_blank">daniel@flashware.net</a></font></font></div>
<br></div><div><div class="h5">
On 14/03/2012 8:17 AM, Bruce Axtens wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">Yes, followed not far behind by "if you can't fix in x
minutes, reimage to the SOE"<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Kai <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vk6ksj@westnet.com.au" target="_blank">vk6ksj@westnet.com.au</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">General
observation in my workplace which is predominantly Windows
environment, when a remote server's been up for a month or so
and feedback is that logons and general performance is slow,
first thing I hear the tech say is "we'll just give it a
reboot, if that doesn't clean things up then we'll look
further..."<br>
<br>
Is that a widespread attitude with Windows servers?<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Off-topic mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Off-topic@plug.org.au" target="_blank">Off-topic@plug.org.au</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/off-topic" target="_blank">http://lists.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/off-topic</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Off-topic mailing list
<a href="mailto:Off-topic@plug.org.au" target="_blank">Off-topic@plug.org.au</a>
<a href="http://lists.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/off-topic" target="_blank">http://lists.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/off-topic</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Off-topic mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Off-topic@plug.org.au">Off-topic@plug.org.au</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/off-topic" target="_blank">http://lists.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/off-topic</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>