[plug] Reply-to headers
Bret Busby
bret at clearsol.iinet.net.au
Wed Aug 9 15:36:31 WST 2000
Matt Kemner wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima wrote:
>
> > The Options are:
> > Yes : Yes we should set the reply-to header to the list
> > No : Leave it how it is
> > Don't Care : You don't mind and are prepared to let others make the
> > choice
>
> What about
>
> "Remove Reply-to: header altogether"?
> In the votes I've been receiving by email, that one is actually leading.
>
> I think I'd prefer to keep receiving the votes by email, rather than use
> the web-based form, so there is some sort of validation.
>
> I agree that it's open to all list members though.
>
> - Matt
If two polls are operating in parallel, do we need to cast a vote on
both? If anyone does, does that confuse it all?
Having voted on the list poll, and, having made my feelings clear (I
hope), I am wondering whether I need to vote on the web page poll (No,
anyone who disagrees with my view, don't tell me not to vote on the web
page poll, just to reduce the number of votes for the mailing list
overriding the Reply To address).
--
Bret Busby
......................................
More information about the plug
mailing list