[plug] zsh vs bash

[John Breen]

I got the opposite impression, particularly in light of his comments that
ksh93 was now available in an Open Source form, under AT&T's new licensing
system...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian" <christian at amnet.net.au>
To: <plug at plug.linux.org.au>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [plug] zsh vs bash


> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 01:11:01PM +0800, Jason Nicholls wrote:
>
> > Read an interview with the Korn shell author on Slashdot. He outlines
the
> > strengths of ksh:
> >
> > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/02/06/2030205&mode=thread
> >
> > FYI, I use bash cause that's what my RH system comes configured with by
> > default. I have used tcsh (mainly because we had an assignment based on
it at
> > Uni) and I must agree with Christian that bash is far better for both
> > interactive and scripting. I haven't used zsh.
>
> Yeah, I read it.  But my impression of what he said was that there was
> no non-proprietary implementation of ksh93 so it hardly matters how
> great ksh is! :(
>
>