smime, was RE: [plug] 1) rsync 2) rsync vs

[Simon Scott]

	no


	From:	Mike Holland <myk at golden.wattle.id.au> on 11/07/2001 08:54
AM
	Please respond to plug at plug.linux.org.au@SMTP at Exchange
	To:	plug at plug.linux.org.au@SMTP at Exchange
	cc:	 

	Subject:	smime, was RE: [plug] 1) rsync 2) rsync vs 

	On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Bill Pickett wrote:

	>    [ Part 1, Application/X-PKCS7-MIME  6.8KB. ]
	>    [ Cannot display this part. Press "V" then "S" to save in a
file. ]

	Am I the only one whose mailer cant read this?
	And the S/N ratio is already low without all those digital
certificates.
	  If you really must have those digital signatures, whats wrong
	with a separate attachment? A one-line PK-encrypted hash should do
job,
	rather than pages of certificates. Not that anybody is bothering to
verify
	them anyway, though I appreciate the principle involved.

	-- 
	Mike Holland  <mike at golden.wattle.id.au>
	                          --==--




**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify 
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************