[plug] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] Why the USA will fail miserably if it attacks Afghanistan

Craig Foster fostware at iinet.net.au
Sun Sep 23 16:47:21 WST 2001


Sheesh, after three e-mails, you could at least spell "boring"
correctly...

And the comments really didn't add to either the usefulness of the thread
or comment on list policy.


Regards,

Craig Foster

-----Original Message-----
From: Bret Busby [mailto:bret at busby.net]
Sent: Sunday, 23 September 2001 3:41 PM
To: plug at plug.linux.org.au
Subject: Re: [plug] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] Why the USA will fail miserably
if it attacks Afghanistan


On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Mike wrote:

> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 13:49:06
> From: Mike <erazmus at iinet.net.au>
> Reply-To: plug at plug.linux.org.au
> To: plug at plug.linux.org.au
> Subject: Re: [plug] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] Why the USA will fail miserably
>     if it attacks Afghanistan
> Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 13:32:39 +0800 (WST)
> Resent-From: plug at plug.linux.org.au
>
> At 11:13 AM 23/9/2001 +0800, you wrote:
> > Note that the US has absolutely no intention of trying
> >to invade and control Afghanistan. Bush may be that dumb (he did say
> >"crusade", after all) but its not a dictatorship in the US.
>
> <cough> Its democracy on one day in each four years, the other times
> its an individual who may or may not listen to advice,
>
> Why is that not a dictatorship, even from a relatively benign
perspective ?
>
> There are many political analyists internationally as well as many
> intellectuals in USA that recognise US is a type of rogue state,
>
>
> My information (so far) is this:
>
> a.	Saddam Hussein is behind the WTC attack and hired operatives
> 	which do and had worked for Ossama bin laden.
>
> b.	Saddam and Ossam are however not the best of friends ~`:o
>
> c.	Religion has nothing to do with it,
>
> d.	Saddam has often stated that Afghanistan should be wiped out
> 	(prob because its a threat to religious version in Iraq),
> 	Saddam has had an issue with fringe states like Iran and
> 	Afganhistan for a long while...
>
> I really think the first priority for USA is to get Saddam and let his
> minions get Ossama...
>
> You see, this distraction allows Saddam (and others such as Pakistan
> - wihtout sanctions) to further develop their nuclear and trinary nerve
> gas capabilities - my information is also that common agents for nerve
> gas are developed in Iraq - with the key third component develped in
> Pakistan or by the Russian Mafia for any number of purposes...
>
> I am also advised that the Russian Mafia is behind the short selling
> of Insurance stocks in USA prior to WTC attack, prob there is a link
> between some elements of Iraqi military intelligence and Russian
> mafia trying to get their hands on old Russian nuclear weapons !
>
> rgds
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>

Booring!




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.plug.org.au/pipermail/plug/attachments/20010923/e5c0b185/attachment.bin>


More information about the plug mailing list