[plug] rsync peer to peer style?
Trevor Phillips
T.Phillips at murdoch.edu.au
Thu Jan 16 08:14:46 WST 2003
James Devenish wrote:
>
> There is a hint of implication in your e-mail that the files could be
> modified on either of the machines, so you need a symmetrical method
> that was write privileges on both machines. But if you don't want
Actually, no. In this case, one of the machines has a known good copy.
It's for instances where you've transferred a large file by whatever
means (scp, ftp, p2p, CD, tape), and at the end of the day, the copy is
corrupt somehow. Rather than re-transferring the whole thing, I'm after
a way of just fixing the parts that are corrupt - which rsync will do.
> rsh/ssh or account knowledge -- how do you plan to authenticate
> the synchronisation task? Will you have one of the machines mounted
I know rsync can act as a server - but I've never looked into it in any
detail, and this is a little different in that:
- I want the remote client to WRITE to the "server"
- I want to be able to configure what is shared at runtime (ie; from
the command line, not from a config file)
I admit I have yet to read the rsync manual closely yet... ^_^;;
> on the other or not? What do you mean by "problems" -- differing
> contents, missing file, wrong internal file structure?
> Unison, <http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/>, will do what you
> describe since it can listen on a TCP port and accept connections from
> all and sundry without the need for accounts on the destination host
Cool! Unison sounds like it's made to do what I want (amongst other
things...) I'll give it a shot...
--
. Trevor Phillips - http://jurai.murdoch.edu.au/ .
: Web Technical Administrator - T.Phillips at murdoch.edu.au :
| IT Services - Murdoch University |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------<
| On nights such as this, evil deeds are done. And good deeds, of /
| course. But mostly evil, on the whole. /
\ -- (Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters) /
More information about the plug
mailing list