[plug] [meta] Reply-To override, was OT free trade

[James Devenish]

In message <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402201004530.12047 at ob>
on Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:17:51AM +0800, Mike Holland wrote:
> IIRC,...it was decided to add Reply-To headers, but not if one already
> existed. Perhaps this got lost in the switch to mailman?

For so many reasons, adding this one to the list of those reasons, I
have been recommending that we change to a different version of Mailman.