[plug] Copy of my response to SCO ANZ, FYI

[Shayne O'Neill]

You rock leon :)

If I remember, I'll call the ACCC asap. I have in the past dealt with the
ACCC and have found them a friendly department who DO listen to complaints
from the community.

Lets put the screws on these buggers.

------------------------------------
"Must not Sleep! Must warn others!"
-Aesop.
Shayne O'Neill. Indymedia. Fun.
http://www.perthimc.asn.au

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Leon Brooks wrote:

> Subject: I want to know what's for sale
>
> The SCO Group in the person of Kieran O'Shaughnessy announced on 19
> January 2004 that:
> > The SCO Intellectual Property (IP) License permits the use of
> > SCO's intellectual property, in binary form only, as contained
> > in Linux distributions.
>
> What intellectual property?
>
> If SCO ANZ can't _specifically_ identify any significant portions of The
> SCO Group's intellectual property in a timely manner in any of the
> Linux distributions which CyberKnights deploy, we must assume that SCO
> ANZ is making fraudulent claims and must in defense of CyberKnights'
> good name vigorously pursue public acknowledgement of fault and
> material redress from SCO ANZ.
>
> Linux distributions which CyberKnights currently have deployed include,
> so far, Mandrake (up to 9.2), Debian (stable and testing), Red Hat
> (7.3, 8.0, 9.0 and Enterprise), Fedora (1.0), SuSE (9), Gentoo and
> Knoppix (3.2, 3.3).
>
> Take notice that even if SCO ANZ substantiates this somewhat nebulous
> claim to ownership-through-contamination of software not designed or
> written by them, a binary-only licence would be of limited use to me
> since some deployments require the use of source code in rebuilding a
> kernel, specifically for drivers whose intellectual property claims
> appear to conflict with SCO ANZ's and whose evidence of ownership is
> somewhat more substantial.
>
> As a Director of CyberKnights Pty Ltd, I personally know and trust
> several contributors to the Linux kernel, including the original
> author, Mr Linus Torvalds. As of three days ago, Linus told me that he
> knows of no substantial code in his Linux kernel source code tree which
> could possibly be subject to ownership claims by The SCO Group.
>
> Linus has been consistently truthful and unambiguous in all of the
> accessible public and personal statements which I have been able to
> locate. The SCO Group has a well-documented history of ambiguous and
> often surprising claims, contradictions and retractions. On this basis,
> I find it unreasonable to do other than prefer to trust statements by
> Linus in favour of statements by The SCO Group or any of its branches,
> agents or other minions.
>
> In short, the burden of proof lies with The SCO Group. Unless and until
> SCO ANZ demonstrates serious and specific substantiation of the claims
> it makes in this announcement, CyberKnights Pty Ltd does not believe
> that it is using The SCO Group's property at all, and therefore refuses
> to even consider paying any licence fees.
>
> > The SCO IP License is currently available at introductory pricing
> > of AUD$999.00 per server processor and AUD$285.00 per desktop
> > processor.
>
> This would more than double the customer's cost per server, including
> the hardware, for most of the servers which CyberKnights installs, and
> for no material advantage. In our eyes these properties make it an
> unreasonable demand.
>
> If SCO ANZ were to demonstrate ownership of substantial Linux code, the
> only viable alternative such pricing would leave CyberKnights is to
> reinstall a system other than Linux on customers' machines - such as
> FreeBSD - involving considerable disruption to customer services.
>
> MS-Windows is too unstable, insecure and expensive, and opens privacy
> and control concerns which are unacceptable to several of my customers;
> SCO's own Unix offerings are pitifully feature-starved, too expensive,
> and recent versions appear to include driver code stolen wholesale from
> other authors without acknowledgement; Sun are a licencee of The SCO
> Group and CyberKnights could not in good conscience use software
> licenced from a company which appears to be unreasonably greedy,
> unpredictable and apparently disrespectful of the intellectual property
> of others.
>
> > Forward looking statement safe harbor:
>
> The weaselly disclaimer which followed does not provide SCO ANZ with a
> safe harbour. Threatening letters demanding monies with menaces can
> hardly be thought to be defused by statement to the effect that
> enforcement of the unambiguous claim to fees is yet future and might
> possibly not be followed through.
>
> That this disclaimer is placed among the notes for editors well after
> the content of the announcment is delineated with the line "ends" is a
> fairly clear indication that it is not a part of the announcement
> proper.
>
> If CyberKnights has not recieved clear, precise and substantial
> identification of the specific code which SCO ANZ claims fees from us
> for by 01 February 2004, we will begin our defense by referring the
> matter to the appropriate legal authorities, and vigorously pursue a
> positive resolution from there.
>
> Cheers; Leon
>
> _______________________________________________
> plug mailing list
> plug at plug.linux.org.au
> http://mail.plug.linux.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug
>