[plug] hdparm troubles
Bernd Felsche
bernie at innovative.iinet.net.au
Sat Jul 17 12:28:05 WST 2004
On Saturday 17 July 2004 11:14, Steve Boak wrote:
> I'm trying to optimise the hd performance on my Via C3 500MHz system, and
> wondering why I have such terrible performance with what I thought was a
> fairly good configuration.
>
> min:~# hdparm -X68 -c3 -m16 -d1 /dev/hda
> /dev/hda:
> setting 32-bit IO_support flag to 3
> setting multcount to 16
> setting using_dma to 1 (on)
> setting xfermode to 68 (UltraDMA mode4)
> multcount = 16 (on)
> IO_support = 3 (32-bit w/sync)
> using_dma = 1 (on)
>
> min:~# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda
> /dev/hda:
> Timing buffer-cache reads: 192 MB in 2.03 seconds = 94.58 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 12 MB in 3.20 seconds = 3.75 MB/sec
>
> 3.75 MB/sec ???
> udma is enabled in the BIOS,
> 80-way cables installed,
> brand new WDC WD800BB hd.
> What have I missed?
Seems like DMA isn't actually on. I get 5.64 MB/sec on my 933MHz C3
reading 64MB with a non-DMA drive in a generic Pentium 2.2.x
kernel... and 37.74 off a 7200rpm 80GB with UDMA on a C3-compiled
2.4.20(?) kernel.
Maybe the IDE chipset drivers aren't working.
Scary figures on this system;
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.32 seconds =400.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.35 seconds = 47.41 MB/sec
Buffer-cache is very fast, but actual disk isn't very much quicker
than the Mini-ITX
--
/"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
\ / ASCII ribbon campaign | I'm a .signature virus!
X against HTML mail | Copy me into your ~/.signature
/ \ and postings | to help me spread!
More information about the plug
mailing list