[plug] windows - a rant
Michael Collard
quadfour at iinet.net.au
Fri May 7 17:31:12 WST 2004
Windows is a joke at best.
That about sums it up for me. Don't get me wrong, I could rant on
through pages and pages of reasons for the above but I think you all
know (or should know) what I mean :)
Michael Collard
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:02, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 16:48, George Raphael wrote:
>
> > There are clearly some very poor operating systems. Two that come to mind
> > are Windows 98 and Mac OS 7. They weren't even good at the time. DOS was
> > more stable.
>
> ?!?
>
> I would've put OS7 up there with the _best_ when it was released. While
> it's reliability wasn't 100%, it was reasonably solid - and otherwise a
> very good OS. Even if you did need an add-on TCP/IP stack and PPP
> software. Remember, though, that OS7 was around for a long time, and
> perhaps didn't age very gracefully. IFIRC, OS7 was initially up against
> Windows 3.1.1, before the release of Win95 - and there was just no
> contest.
>
> OS9, on the other hand, deserves a place below even Win98 IMHO. No
> protected memory, a really shoddy (IMHO) virtual memory system, no SMP
> support except through a scary application-level library, etc. Bad fonts
> also cause it to fall on its face, often in bizarre and truly unexpected
> ways. To top it all off, it doesn't seem to do network disk access
> asynchronously - if a program accesses something on a network volume,
> almost everything _stops_ until it gets it. If the remote machine
> happens to have crashed... you're in for quite a wait.
>
> Craig Ringer
>
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.linux.org.au
> http://mail.plug.linux.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au
>
More information about the plug
mailing list