[plug] RAID on a gigabyte 7N400p2 MoBo

[Chris Griffin]

So is the hardware RAID likley to give me grief or do you think it
should be fine?

On 12/16/05, Jonathan Young <jonathan at pcphix.com> wrote:
>  Shouldn't be too bad, though I haven't tried it in practice.
>
>  In theory, match the partitions on both disks, laid out how you would
> prefer for Linux plus whatever space / partitions you are allocating for
> Windows. Next, install Windows and set up it's software raid so that the two
> windows partitions (one per disk) are mirrored and the other partitions are
> left untouched and empty for your Linux installation. Install Linux and set
> up it's software RAID... done!  So really.. the Windows side of things
> shouldn't be an issue.
>
>  However, hardware RAID is always going to be better because you would
> really only have to worry about maintaining one drive and set of partitions
> as you normally do and just expect the other drive to be matching it.
>
>  In general, Windows software RAID has been a bit risky and hardware RAID
> has always been less stress!
>
>
>  Chris Griffin wrote:
>
>  That sounds like the one.
> The trouble is I have the system partitioned and dual booting. So, I
> wanted to have the hardware do the mirroring at that level and then
> just partition and install the OS's.
> Although partitioning both disks the same and using Linux software
> RAID would be fine for Linux part, I would not think it would be so
> easy on the XP side?
>
> On 12/15/05, Bernd Felsche <bernie at innovative.iinet.net.au>
> wrote:
>
>
>  Chris Griffin <griffinster at gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
>  Hopefully getting the subject right (RAID instead of RAIN, bad day) I
> might get an answer.
>
>
>  I have a gigabyte 7N400 Pro 2 motherboard and the manual says the
> hardware RAID should work with Linux. They cite a RedHat 7.3 install.
> Has anyone actually done this?
> Can I expect it to work out of the box these days with say Fedora 4?
>
>  ITE8212 chipset?
>
> I believe that that is supported directly in the more-recent kernels.
> 2.6.13 and later.
>
> I humbly suggest that you don't use the on-board RAID; just the
> interfaces and employ a software raid (md) instead. That means that
> when the motherboard dies, you can take the drives and plug them
> into another system and be able to read them as before.
> --
> /"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
> \ / ASCII ribbon campaign | Socialist \So"cial*ist\, n.
>  X against HTML mail | One who knows what's best for
> / \ and postings | everyone else.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.org.au
> http://www.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.org.au
> http://www.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>  Jonathan Young
>  Director of PC-PHIX
>  jonathan at pcphix.com
>
>  Phone: 0410 455 674
>  Web: http://www.pcphix.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.org.au
> http://www.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au
>
>
>