[plug] Why Microsoft Must Control One Laptop Per Child

John Knight anarchist_tomato at hotmail.com
Sat Jan 12 09:29:02 WST 2008


Bruce's opinion is biased and distorted on this issue. He flipped out after the M$ engineers were around and one of the OLPC presented their side of the story. If you check the posting he's done below the article, he's completely missed the point.

http://radian.org/notebook/paradox-of-choice

Great quote from OLPC:
"To claim we should prohibit XO customers from running XP in the
interest of freedom is to claim everyone should be free to make a
choice — as long as it’s a choice we agree with."

"...it was brilliant, there was three up against a thousand, and boy, did we give those three heaps!"

> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:57:34 +0900
> From: vk6ksj at westnet.com.au
> To: plug at plug.org.au
> Subject: [plug] Why Microsoft Must Control One Laptop Per Child
> 
> Any comments ?
> 
> Why Microsoft Must Control One Laptop Per Child
> http://technocrat.net/d/2008/1/10/33518
> 
> -- 
> PosITive - Photography and Information Technology
> www.vk6ksj.net
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.org.au
> http://www.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au

_________________________________________________________________
What are you waiting for? Join Lavalife FREE
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D30288&_t=764581033&_r=email_taglines_Join_free_OCT07&_m=EXT
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plug.org.au/pipermail/plug/attachments/20080112/c4a3f07d/attachment.html>


More information about the plug mailing list