[plug] OT: Pool of IPs for testing load-balanced connections
Paul
hooker at iinet.net.au
Thu Sep 3 15:53:24 WST 2009
I'd go for CSIRO, ASIO (!), AFP, WA Police equipment - those kinds of
site. All stuff that you'd expect to stay online. A few ICMP packets
won't be noticed let alone worried about (IMHO clearly).
Paul
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 11:01 +0800, Adrian Woodley wrote:
> G'day PLUGers,
>
> I've just about finished the new design for the networking of the
> various mobile comms facilities at work. Each comms unit should have an
> Internet connection, either via NextG or a satellite uplink.
>
> The new network design will allow any combination of comms facilities
> and up-links to join the Local Inter-Network Connection (LINC) and share
> their routing information.
>
> Once the facilities are networked, the device with the highest priority
> will be elected the default gateway for all other devices. Additionally,
> each facility, with its own Internet connection, will load-balance
> between its connection and the elected gateway.
>
> The (minor) issue I'm facing is that for the load balancing to work, the
> router (embedded system running pfSense) needs to be able to ping a
> (unique) target out on the Internet. What I need is a pool of very
> stable IPs to test against, say around two dozen.
>
> The targets must be IPs, rather than host-names, as until a ping is
> successful there is no Internet connection and therefore no DNS.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Adrian
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.org.au
> http://www.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au
>
More information about the plug
mailing list