[plug] Why not GPL it ? [was Intellectual Property]

[Mike from West Australia]

At 01:14 PM 3/8/2000 +0800, you wrote:

>> (This post has made the original post somewhat irrelevant by totally
>> changing the topic if I remember correctly. My apologies but I think the
>> question may get a better answer if we discuss some of these other issues).
>> 
>> 
>
>We have developed software, on contract, but, not on the Linux OS
>platform.
>
>In answer to the above, I reiterate (without restating what I have
>previously said on the subject, in the context of the integrity of
>software developed for a particular client, and, the responsibility, in
>other words, liability, of the contractor, for any defects that are
>found in the software developed for the client (especially where the
>software has been modified by a party other than the contractor).

<hrrrm> You forgot to close an additional right parenthesis for proper
hitherto unbeknownset nesting level in the above declaration...

does that make the logic invalid ;-)

Didn't know there was much lisp on the list,

<grin>

Rgds

Mike