[plug] Why not GPL it ? [was Intellectual Property]

[Bret Busby]

Mike from West Australia wrote:
> 
> At 01:14 PM 3/8/2000 +0800, you wrote:
> 
> >> (This post has made the original post somewhat irrelevant by totally
> >> changing the topic if I remember correctly. My apologies but I think the
> >> question may get a better answer if we discuss some of these other issues).
> >>
> >>
> >
> >We have developed software, on contract, but, not on the Linux OS
> >platform.
> >
> >In answer to the above, I reiterate (without restating what I have
> >previously said on the subject, in the context of the integrity of
> >software developed for a particular client, and, the responsibility, in
> >other words, liability, of the contractor, for any defects that are
> >found in the software developed for the client (especially where the
> >software has been modified by a party other than the contractor).
> 
> <hrrrm> You forgot to close an additional right parenthesis for proper
> hitherto unbeknownset nesting level in the above declaration...

Aaargh!

Should have read:


> >In answer to the above, I reiterate (without restating) what I have
> >previously said on the subject, in the context of the integrity of
> >software developed for a particular client, and, the responsibility, in
> >other words, liability, of the contractor, for any defects that are
> >found in the software developed for the client (especially where the
> >software has been modified by a party other than the contractor).

> 
> does that make the logic invalid ;-)

Is that invalid, as in not valid, or, invalid, as in ill?

> 
> Didn't know there was much lisp on the list,

Does that mean that lisp is list-driven?

:~)

-- 

Bret Busby

......................................