[plug] RH 7.1

[Simon Scott]

	yup, but its backwards compatible I think

	I probably wouldnt use 2.4 in a server just yet.... give it a little
while.... I know of quite a few installations of kernel 2.0 (or less!) for
servers, esp. firewalls.




	From:	John Breen <wombat at wa.apana.org.au> on 18-04-2001 02:17 PM
	Please respond to plug at plug.linux.org.au@SMTP at Exchange
	To:	plug at plug.linux.org.au@SMTP at Exchange
	cc:	 

	Subject:	Re: [plug] RH 7.1

	Yes, 7.0 came with the 2.2.16 kernel.

	2.4.x changes the whole ipchains thing again, doesn't it?

	----- Original Message -----
	From: "Kai" <vk6ksj at siwa.com.au>
	To: <plug at plug.linux.org.au>
	Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 2:30 PM
	Subject: Re: [plug] RH 7.1


	> John,
	>
	> I thought of grabbing it but the .2 releases usually contain more
	> bugfixes and stuff so I think I'l wait till 7.2 comes out.
	> I think 7.0 had the old 2.2.x kernel? 7.1 has the new 2.4 kernel
and a
	> few other bits and peices.
	>
	> In case you want specs:
	>
	
http://www.lsl.com.au/reference/redhat-71-GPL-note.php?lslsid=8ee65a09d59aea
	ba37aa4e493d1defd3&referer=
	>
	> If you decide to upgrade to 7.1, you want to let me know how well
it
	> goes?
	> TIA
	>
	> Kai
	>
	> John Breen wrote:
	> >
	> > I know there are (still) some Redhatters out there...
	> >
	> > Has anyone played with RH 7.1?  Is it worth the time and effort
of
	upgrading
	> > from  7.0?
	> >
	> > Suggestions, anyone (other than, "don't use RH, use...")
	> >
	> > Regards,
	> >
	> > John Breen
	> >
	> > +------
	> > | John Breen
	> > | B Sc(Computer Science)
	> > |
	> > | john at fairport.com.au
	> > | ICQ#777296
	>
	>




**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify 
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************