[plug] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] Why the USA will fail miserably if it attacks Afghanistan

[Bret Busby]

On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Mike Holland wrote:

> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:13:51 +0800 (WST)
> From: Mike Holland <myk at golden.wattle.id.au>
> Reply-To: plug at plug.linux.org.au
> To: Perth Linux User Group <plug at plug.linux.org.au>
> Subject: Re: [plug] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] Why the USA will fail miserably
>     if it attacks Afghanistan
> Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:11:47 +0800 (WST)
> Resent-From: plug at plug.linux.org.au
> 
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Leon Brooks wrote:
> 
> > This is probably the best summary of conditions there that I've seen so far:
> >
> >     http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-000075191sep19.story
> 
> Its now the top article on slashdot, if you want to join the discussion.
> 
>  Note that the US has absolutely no intention of trying
> to invade and control Afghanistan. Bush may be that dumb (he did say
> "crusade", after all) but its not a dictatorship in the US.
>   But what are they going to do? Can/will Pakistan supply sufficient
> intelligence for some special-ops?
> 
> [ But how did Afghan get at the top of the bad-guys list? The terrorism
> is, as always, mostly done by Arabs, not Afghans or Iranians etc. ]
> 
> > The lamb-like power, it seems, wants to speak with the voice of the Beast.
> 
> "Revelations"?  (Not Nostradamus from you Leon, I hope!)
> 
> 

Booring!