[plug] RH7.x
Bret Busby
bret at busby.net
Tue Aug 27 00:59:13 WST 2002
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Tony Clark wrote:
> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:24:01 +0200
> From: Tony Clark <tclark at telia.com>
> Reply-To: plug at plug.linux.org.au
> To: plug at plug.linux.org.au
> Subject: Re: [plug] RH7.x
> Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:24:26 +0800 (WST)
> Resent-From: plug at plug.linux.org.au
>
> On Monday 26 August 2002 07.39, Bret Busby wrote:
> >
> > So far, 7.3 seems good to me. The main thing that I have found, that I
> > don't like, is the lack of availability of the RHN for the up2date
> > agent, unless a person pays for being able to update, which makes RH a
> > bit mercenary, when users have to pay for bug fixes. But, that goes to
> > my standards for software development, which appear to be different to
> > RH's standards for software development.
>
> How dare RH charge for providing a service. I agree with you! It should all
> be free from those thieving mungrels, they can go on and make all their
> services free and file for chapter 11 protection when they run out of cash.
> A much better senario for GNU/Linux don't you think?
>
> OTOH you could always download the file and use rpm -uvh or choose one of the
> many other _free_ tools that will handle dependencies for you.
>
> dum founded
>
I remember you now.
You are the filthy scum who decided to criminally defame me on this
list, back in February.
--
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..............
"So once you do know what the question actually is,
you'll know what the answer means."
- Deep Thought,
Chapter 28 of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
- Douglas Adams, 1988
....................................................
More information about the plug
mailing list