[plug] Best motherboard / chip combo 4 linux?
ryan at is.as.geeky.as
ryan at is.as.geeky.as
Sun Dec 1 00:00:28 WST 2002
My new laptop, which I'll post about later, is Intel throughout and i've
never had an easier time getting things to work. APCI is completely
flawless *stops to stare at the battery applet* I never used to like
Intel only motherboards until now.
It doesn't have an NVidia card, but my desktop does and the latest
binary driver offering (>= 1.0.3123) is superb from my dealings with it
(Geforce2 MX). Mileage obviously varies here as I remember reading
something in some unrelated thread bagging their drivers not long ago
:) It doesn't make anything barf, even ACPI.
My past dealings with SiS have been *VERY* tense.
Ryan
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 10:31, Craig Ringer wrote:
> > Can you suggest where I can read some current reviews on motherboards
> > for Linux?
>
> I don't really see them anymore. There's probably a good reason for
> that: I've never run into an incompatable one, not even old P100 boards.
> There's no linux support for AMR/ACRs but really who cares. All onboard
> sound chips I've encountered are supported, as are chipsets, CPUs etc.
> If you're getting onboard video, watch out for NVidia (good, but only if
> you don't mind the occasionally annoying binary-only driver) and Trident
> (CyberBlade XP support is only just getting into XFree86 and currently
> requires you to replace the trident module with one built from XF86 CVS
> to get it to work in anything but VESA mode).
>
> Intel, VIA and AMD chipsets should all be fine.
>
> I've never had to pay attention to "linux-specific issues" on my boards
> when I upgrade, I just buy my pick of board.
>
> Warning: if you want working, reliable APM/ACPI you may have to pay more
> attention to which board you get. Sorry, can't help you there - NVidia
> drivers kill the stability of the system if APM or ACPI is active, so I
> don't get any PM features at all.
More information about the plug
mailing list