Yay Jeremy (was Re: [plug] Spam sender sues)

[Jeremy Malcolm]

Simon Scott wrote:
> 
> OK, can someone explain something to me?
> 
> What possible bitch could T3 have? I mean legally, how could they have a leg
> to stand on?

Their argument is extremely obscure at present.  Best I can make out,
they have two limbs to the argument:

(a) intentional interference with contractual relations (deliberately
causing T3 to breach its contracts with its customers); and

(b) secondary boycott (basically where two or more people act together
to prevent the supply of goods or services from one third party to
another).

Maybe I'm giving them too much credit, though, because none of this is
explicit in their pleading.