[plug] Linux beats Windows in cost study

Trent Lloyd trent at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
Tue May 7 08:34:02 WST 2002


ms office is like "standard" these days
if you didnt have it to do your homework on you would be looked up on
weirdly...

so lets all shell out $1200 a go for doing out homework. hmm no thanks

On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 05:37:19PM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Monday 06 May 2002 17:20, Jacqueline McNally wrote:
> > This same article was posted to a schoolie list by someone else, and what
> > they have filtered out the article, is how many IT professionals that you
> > need to support 250 computers in a school, and that Linux professionals get
> > paid more.
> 
> I think my chequebook stopped reading at the point where the M$ 
> software-plus-licencing budget exceeded $1,000,000.00 per employee versus 
> about 30c per employee for Linux.
> 
> If you read the Peruvian article (see mails entitled `Go Peru!'), Microsoft 
> accounted software and licencing costs as 8% of all IT expenses (and then 
> went on to claim that losing this will devastate the Peruvian IT market in a 
> later point, which faux pas the nice Senator proceeded to bludgeon them with, 
> but that's another story), so in theory the max saving would be 8% of IOT 
> spending.
> 
> OTOH, school IT budgets, particularly small schools, would hardly match the 
> average industry profile. Not many corporations factor in donated computer 
> hardware or volunteer time. Does anyone have any hard data (as percentages 
> rather than $ amounts) for categories of IT spending in Australian schools? 
> Mike?
> 
> Cheers; Leon
> 



More information about the plug mailing list