[plug] [OT] opinions: SCSI hard disks
Craig Foster
fostware at iinet.net.au
Sat Apr 26 03:26:37 WST 2003
Jon Miller <mailto:jlmiller at mmtnetworks.com.au> wrote:
> If you look on the IBM web site and look up Linux and benchmarking you
> will see their benchmark test using rhl7.3 and their server with all
> the details of what they did. As for drives since I use IBM SCSI
> drives all the time, I've yet run into any problems that I keep
> hearing about on any of the servers that I've built. I would
> recommend that you look at the 36 or 73GB HDD. As for the onboard
> controller, use it only for the backup (all onboard SCSI controllers
> are usually (90%) of the time a strip-down version of the rreal deal.
> I tend to buy an separate card from either IBM or Adaptec for the
> drives.
>
> Jon
>
<snip>
Search through the PLUG archives for AD (or active-directory - can't
remember which), propagation, and RAID.
Those two dead RAID5 members were IBM 36GB USCSIs.
Two drives, not a week old from the wholesaler, died at the same time
(10min difference)
No more IBM SCSI for me :/
Regards,
Craig Foster
fostware at iinet.net.au (with SMIME)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3238 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.plug.org.au/pipermail/plug/attachments/20030426/1a7377bc/attachment.bin>
More information about the plug
mailing list