[plug] Minimum spec's for Mandrake 9
indy at THE-TECH.MIT.EDU
indy at THE-TECH.MIT.EDU
Mon Feb 10 08:44:05 WST 2003
I have run KDE 2.x (and currently Gnome 1.4) on a Pentium II 266 (on Debian)
with 190 Mb Ram and it is ok. I run too many daemons to experiment with,
but I reckon if you didn't you could squeeze into 128 Mb pretty well.
Indy.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:26:03AM +0800, Richard Meyer wrote:
> I doubt that you'd get much joy with X with KDE or Gnome. It should run
> happily without X, but I presume that the point of the exercise is to
> demonstrate a "better Windows than Windows". Maybe one of the other
> "lighter" environments will be usable
>
> RichardM
>
> ----- Forwarded by Richard Meyer/Australia/Contr/IBM on 10/02/2003 08:23 AM
> -----
>
> "David Buddrige"
> <buddrige at wasp.ne To: plug at plug.linux.org.au
> t.au> cc:
> Subject: [plug] Minimum spec's for Mandrake 9
> 07/02/2003 03:04
> PM
> Please respond to
> plug
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all you Mandrake guys out there... 8-)
>
> My brother was wanting to load up Linux on a spare computer he has to play
> with it, and check out what it's like. The spec's on the hardware he has
> is:
>
> Pentium II (233 to 333 MHz) system with about 128 Mb RAM and between 7-13
> gig of hard-drive.
>
> I had planned to suggest Mandrake 9; I've been a redhat guy in the past,
> but
> with the UI of Redhat 8, I suspect it might be a bit sluggish; Will the
> above spec's be sufficiently powerful to happily run Mandrake 9?
>
> thanks
>
> David
>
>
>
>
--
Indranath Neogy
<indy at the-tech.mit.edu>
More information about the plug
mailing list