[plug] Religious debate - editor wars
Quintin Lette
quintin at arach.net.au
Thu Sep 4 11:03:21 WST 2003
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:55 am, Richard Meyer wrote:
> Does anybody who has used it, think it is worth the price? +- US$200?
>
> You can buy a *l-o-o-o-t* of copies of vi for that price, even if you burn
> each one to its own DVD. :)
>
> Thanks
> RichardM
I can't imagine spending US$200 on an editor.. I'd say vi would win straight
out in that comparison... *I think vim is all I'd ever need anyway and the
being free (and included in my favourite distro - debian) helps*
Just my 2c
>
>
>
>
> indy at THE-TECH.MIT
> .EDU To:
> plug at plug.linux.org.au cc:
> 04/09/2003 10:48 Subject: Re: [plug]
> Religious debate - editor wars AM
> Please respond to
> plug
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I've only used slickedit a little, a long time ago.
> Back then it was projecting to be more of a development tool
> than merely an editor. (I guess most editors do, but since I
> write more prose than code, I try to make the distinction.)
> Looking at the fancy web pages, I'd say it's reached it's goals
> of back then.
>
> Editor ---> Code tool -> IDE
> \
> --> Prose tool > (Integrated writing environment?)
>
> seems to be how it is and slickedit is in the code tool middle there.
>
> If you code a lot in a language it has features for, it's probably
> worth a try.
>
> I'd be curious if anyone has a favourite mouse centric editor,
> as so far I haven't found one for Linux that I'm happy with.
>
>
> Indy
>
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:58:43AM +0800, Richard Meyer wrote:
> > Hi People,
> >
> > Yesterday I was talking to a colleague about editors and he mentioned
> > Slickedit. He personally believed that it was the best editor available -
> > bar none. Is anybody using it? If not, what editors do people recommend
> > (apart from vim/elvis/vi and emacs). ;)
> >
> > RichardM
>
> --
> Indranath Neogy
> <indy at the-tech.mit.edu>
More information about the plug
mailing list