[plug] Red Hat

[Simon Scott]

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:41, Matt Kemner wrote:

> "In accordance with the provisions of the End User License Agreement
>  (EULA), it is required that the trademark and anaconda images be
>  modified so that the trademarks do not appear in the software.  Please
>  note that the mere deletion of these files will corrupt the software."
>

BTW, doesnt this violate the GPL?

I thought it was a violation if you distributed GPL software with any 
secondary clauses attached? What they are saying here is, you can only 
redistribute this GPL'ed software if you are willing to remove all references 
to Redhat from it.

Especially since I thought RedHat's installer is GPL, and would surely have 
references to it being RedHat, how does this work?


_______________________________________________
plug mailing list
plug at plug.linux.org.au
http://mail.plug.linux.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug