[plug] SCO

[Senectus .]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:53:33 +0800, garry <garbuck at westnet.com.au> wrote:
> This is significant....
> 
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050209203941896
> 
> <quote>
> 
> Do you remember when SCO told the world all about the convincing
> materials they'd love to show us but that were submitted to the court
> under seal? If we could see those, they implied, we'd surely be aware of
> how strong their position really was? Well, Judge Kimball saw it all.
> And he says he finds it incredible that after trash talking IBM in
> public for two years, SCO has presented no evidence to back up their words:
> 
>     "Viewed against the backdrop of SCO's plethora of public statements
>     concerning IBM's and others' infringement of SCO's purported
>     copyrights to the UNIX software, it is astonishing that SCO has not
>     offered any competent evidence to create a disputed fact regarding
>     whether IBM has infringed SCO's alleged copyrights through IBM's
>     Linux activities."
> 
> So there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. No competent evidence,
> sealed or public.
> 
> </quote>
> 
> 8^)===
> 
> Woohoooo..
> 
I reckon it sounds like a good excuse for a "party" ;-)

The summary dismissal of SCO's case can't be far away.. 
I reckon it'll be shortly after SCO's last ditch discovery effort..


-- 
Ubuntu Warty 4.10