[plug] cedega ?

Shannon Carver shannon.carver at gmail.com
Fri Aug 11 14:38:45 WST 2006


Hi Tim, 

This was on a P4 2.8Ghz with newish NVIDIA video card, level load time was
significantly slower under Cedega.  I haven't tried it on my new laptop as
yet (core duo 2.06Ghz) with Nvidia Quadro NVS 120, but it runs sweet in
WinXP, even relatively well at 1920x1200.. Mmmmm



> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-bounces at plug.org.au [mailto:plug-bounces at plug.org.au] On Behalf
> Of Timothy White
> Sent: Friday, 11 August 2006 2:07 PM
> To: plug at plug.org.au
> Subject: Re: [plug] cedega ?
> 
> >
> > Just recently I installed Steam (HL2 and CS:S) as part of my Ubuntu &
> Gentoo
> > Installations.  On newer hardware, it really runs quite well, to the
> point I
> > can hardly tell the difference between playing in WinXP and Linux apart
> from
> > the loading times.  However these two games are fairly old now, I'm not
> sure
> > what it would be like if you attempted to play Prey or Fear or FarCry.
> 
> I assume you used Cedega to get HL2 working? I tried when it first
> came out, and gave up. I think having an AMD64 just makes that a
> little bit harder, as you first need the 32bit chroot working
> flawlessly (which Nvidia's drivers don't make any easier), before you
> can get this working.
> 
> When you say load times are different... Which did you find faster? ;-)
> 
> Tim
> --
> Linux Counter user #273956
> Don't email joeblogs at scouts.org.au
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.org.au
> http://www.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au




More information about the plug mailing list