[plug] SAN Advice
pma-la at milleng.com.au
Fri Oct 26 10:20:04 WST 2007
The SAN/NAS choice is getting harder as NAS prices drop. How important
is it to have redundancy? NAS tends to have single points of failure,
whereas SAN tries to avoid them (though can't entirely.)
Also it depends on how you're running your virtual machines... what are
the specs for the machines that will run the VM's? How many VM's will be
accessing the NAS? What OS's are the VM's running? What performance are
you aiming for?
Here are some drive prices to give you a benchmark for the pricing on
the Intel box:
100GB drives - phased out
320GB SATA, 16MB cache: $99
750GB SATA, 16MB cache: $249
So at *full* retail, the drive config for which you've been quoted is:
$99 + ($249 x 6) = $1593
Ergo, you are paying $8407 for the box, CPUs of your choice, RAID card
and M$ license. BTW, I would suggest buying 2x320GB drives for the OS
to run as a RAID1 (mirrored) pair.
Hate to say it, but Dell has a better deal if price is an issue. A Dell
4U server with redundant power supplies, RAID card etc. is probably 2/3
or less of the Intel price all up.
Mark Slatem wrote:
> Thanks for the advice and the link you provided. The inquirer url shows
> the exact device we have been quoted on, the given price includes 1 x
> 100GB and 6 x 750GB Seagate SATA Drives. At the moment we are undecided
> on the SAN VS NAS, what is your opinion on both considering we want to
> run virtual machines on them. Also if we went for the "Intel Storage
> Creek 2" what OS flavor would you recommend?
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 08:33 +0800, Paul Antoine wrote:
>> Do you need a SAN or a NAS?
>> The info I have seems to indicate that you could run Linux on the Intel
>> box if you wished as it's really just a server with lots of drive bays
>> at the front :-)
>> Does the $10,000 include any drives? Is it the version with the RAID
>> Here's a link to the release from the Inquirer:
>> Hope this helps,
>> BTW: I pointed my friend Casper at the Drobo, which runs Linux. They
>> are apparently producing an gigabit ethernet version to compliment the
>> current USB2.0 version which has had good reviews. Casper contacted
>> Drobo about an Australian distributor - they said they're working on a
>> 240v version to satisfy global requirements. http://www.drobo.com
>> Silly American companies often save a few $$s by putting in a 110v only
>> switchmode PSU... always bites them in the bum by delaying time to
>> market elsewhere in the world.
> PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.org.au
> Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au
More information about the plug