[plug] Gnome's annoying Windoze-isms
Daniel Pittman
daniel at rimspace.net
Sat Apr 11 15:45:30 WST 2009
Jason Posavec <jasonposavec at iinet.net.au> writes:
> I run gnome primarily because it is meant to be faster and lighter
> than the KDE alternative,
This has never been true to any measure I have found, with the one
exception that without prelinking the C++ code used to cost more in
startup dynamic linking overhead.
Certainly, today, I am unable to find any measurable difference in
memory or CPU use, and this has been true for quite some time:
http://swik.net/GNOME/Planet+GNOME/Callum+McKenzie:+KDE+vs.+GNOME:+Memory+Use/qmla
http://ktown.kde.org/~seli/memory/desktop_benchmark.html
> while still keeping functionality.
In my experience, this is also untrue — but those are fighting words,
and probably mostly because I have never bothered to learn how to make
GNOME do the same thing. ;)
> But as of 2.24, I've noticed some cpu-intensive "decoration" creeping
> in. The biggest being the thumbnail views, even in list view. An
> example is 200Gb of Doctor Who avi's I have on a portable hard
> drive. When I click on that directory, it can easily take up to a
> minute before I can do anything with the files while all the hundreds
> of thumbnails load.
That is a huge surprise; isn't GNOME supposed to cache those thumbnails
or something? Certainly KDE does, in my experience.
> List View used to be text only, and that's how I liked it. Now I can't
> seem to turn the thumbnails off at all. Does anybody have any
> suggestions?
I would start by looking into why the GNOME thumbnailer is regenerating
the thumbnail each time — because, certainly, there is no other reason
that displaying a few icons is going to use significant CPU.
(Displaying the icon, in fact, is substantially *less* CPU intensive
than drawing the text next to it.)
> Is there a gnome toolbox I don't know about?
Don't these sort of options usually hide in the registry ^W gconf
database so they don't confuse the end user?
Anyway, I believe that totem is the most likely candidate for generating
video thumbnails, so I would start in the documentation there.
Regards,
Daniel
More information about the plug
mailing list