No subject
Tue Nov 29 10:43:08 WST 2011
Beware ye who use software from the Big Bodgy Software Company, or any other
commercial software from any company, and who dare to critcise the company or
its software.
Bret Busby
.....................
A U G U S T 1 8, 1 9 9 9
AS THE SOFTWARE industry cracks down on its
customers, the software itself is opening up.
Open
Source software, the freely available alternative
to
commercial software, is making inroads in the
corporate world because of its superior
flexibility,
adaptability, and cost. Despite this competition,
the
commercial software industry has decided that
now's the time to make licensed software less
flexible, less adaptable, and above all, more
expensive. A proposed new law, called the Uniform
Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA)
would give software manufacturers enormous new
powers to raise prices and to control their
software
even after it is in the hands of their customers.
By
giving the software industry additional leverage
over
its customers, UCITA will have two principal
effects: first, it will turn software from a
product you
buy to a service you pay for again and again.
Second,
its restrictions will greatly accelerate the
corporate
adoption of Open Source software.
All trade groups aspire to become like OPEC, the
cartel that jacks up oil prices by controlling
supply.
The UCITA working group is no exception: UCITA is
designed to allow software companies relief from
competition (companies could forbid publishing
the
results of software comparisons), and to
artificially
limit supply (any company which was acquired by a
larger company could be forced to re-license all
its
software). The most startling part of UCITA,
though,
is the smugly named "self-help" clause, which
would
allow a software company to remotely disable
software at the customer's site, even after it
has
been sold. This clause could be invoked with only
15
days notice if a software developer felt its
licensing
terms were being violated, making the customer
guilty until proven innocent. UCITA's proponents
disingenuously suggest that the use of
"self-help"
would be rare, as it would make customers unhappy
-- what they are not as quick to point out is
that the
presence of "self-help" as a credible threat
would
give software companies permanent leverage over
their customers in negotiating all future
contracts.
Unfortunately for cartel-minded software firms,
the
OPEC scenario is elusive because software isn't
like oil. Software has no physical scarcity, and
the
people who know how to create good software can't
be isolated or controlled the way oil wells can.
Where UCITA sets out to make software a
controlled substance, the Open Source movement
sets out to take advantage of software's innate
flexibility of distribution. By making software
freely
available and freely modifiable, Open Source
takes
advantage of everything UCITA would limit -- Open
Source software is easy to get, easy to modify,
and
easy to share. If UCITA becomes law, the
difference
between Open Source and commercial software will
become even more stark. Expect Open Source to do
very well in these circumstances.
Economics 101 tells us that people make economic
decisions "on the margin" -- a calculation not of
total worth to total cost, but of additional
worth for
additional cost. For someone who wants a watch
for
telling time but not for status, for example, the
choice between a $20 Timex and a $20,000 Rolex is
clear -- the $19,980 marginal cost of the Rolex
knocks it out of the running. In the case of Open
Source vs. commercial software, the differences
in
cost can be equally vast -- in many cases (such
as
the Apache web server) the Open Source solution
is
both cheaper and better. Cartels only work if
there is
no competition, a fact the UCITA group seems not
to
have grasped. If UCITA becomes law -- that could
happen as soon as December -- the commercial
software industry will be sending its customers
scrambling for Linux, Apache, and the other Open
Source products faster than they already are.
Clay Shirky is a contributing editor at FEED and
Professor of Media Studies at Hunter College.
....................................................
More information about the plug
mailing list