No subject

few voices (I keep hearing these voices...), who thinks it could be
otherwise.

> who, sometimes seems to set his reply-to header and
> other times doesn't.  (I remember helping him fix the problem by
> removing his reply-to headers a few months ago but since he seems to
> have changed back and forth a bit.) 

This is what I mentioned, in a previous posting, it is the wonderful (as
in I wonder why it does it) Netscape, changing its settings, when it
crashes (I think it happens when it crashes; it crashes so often, I am
not sure what is going on with it).

> What I don't see is why everyone is
> jumping up and down and making a big fuss for.  The way the list works
> is *very* simple.  If you want mail to come back to you alone, set
> reply-to accordingly.  If you don't, don't.  The mailing list has been
> behaving this way for many, many months and so why so many people are
> having a fit over it now, I just don't understand. 

I believe, in software development, it is regarded as maintenance;
ongoing monitoring of what the clients (subscribers) want; and,
modifying to suit them.

> Can the thread just
> end?  There is really no need for all this debate (most of which is
> nonsense).