[plug] Porn Filtering options
shayne oneill
shayne at guild.murdoch.edu.au
Tue Dec 17 15:30:21 WST 2002
Yah. Squidguard can be a bit of wierdo to set up, but when set up it works
great.
I used it a while ago at a job after the boss complained of "too much porn"
(aprox 2/3 of surfing!)
in the work place proxy. (I didn't have the heart to point out all the logs
pointed to his logins). It worked
100%
Another compelling reason, is the list is open. No netnanny crap about
hidden lists blocking breastcancer awareness
sites or google caches or crap that turns up in the commercial ones.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima" <tony at cantech.net.au>
To: <plug at plug.linux.org.au>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [plug] Porn Filtering options
> On 17 Dec 2002 caston at iinet.net.au wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > We are looking for a solution here at HQ (http://www.hq.org.au)
> > to filter porn sites from public access machines.
> >
> > We are looking for a list of possible solutions that you have are
familiar
> > with.
> >
> > Another member of the team has tried Squid Guard (supposed to block
> > according to a back list of url's rsync'ed daily) but for some reason
the
> > filtering did not work.
>
> Quite frankly, if it didn't work then it was setup wrong.
>
> I would recomend SquidGuard Symantic also have a product (iProxy?)
> for Linux that will do what you want. I've had little experience with it
> about 2 years ago. It was slow then, don't know about now.
>
> Yours Tony
>
> Jan 22-25 2003 Linux.Conf.AU http://linux.conf.au/
> The Australian Linux Technical Conference!
>
>
More information about the plug
mailing list