[plug] Professional Linux Organisation

[James Elliott]

I echo Navarre's comments and would love to achieve CLP status .... well,
that is not correct - the 'status' thing does not worry me, but I would love
to have the confidence that my knowledge is at least up to or beyond some
certain minimal standard or level.

The list, as it is, is great!  Any one of us can ask a technical question
and it gets answered ... but it would be nice to be able to gain that
confidence which comes from a structured learning approach rather than the
feral learning method where you can be a full bottle on one thing and
totally miss out on another.

James Elliott

----- Original Message -----
From: <navarre at plug.linux.org.au>
To: <plug at plug.linux.org.au>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [plug] Professional Linux Organisation


Hello List,

Being a computer consultant in today's world seems to rely on come form
of certification/ qualification that is recognised, by the IT industry,
home users, government and others.

I personally like Scribes comment and suggestion for a name because:
1) It is a TLA (Three Letter Abbreviation)
2) As a TLA it makes sense.
3) If taken to the point of being Australia wide that in it's self adds
to the credibility of the Society.

As for the other names that use the words 'Open Source' and/ or words to
the same effect, I feel these are trying to be a catch all, more or less
saying 'Not Microsoft'.

Taking by way of example, the concept that Novell uses for it's
certification program work well. There are levels of certification in:
1) Administration, adding users, clearing jammed print queues. etc
2) Engineering including installing, tweaking, fault finding, correcting
problems
3) Training of others to teach these subjects.
4) etc

Just the simple case of using Linux as a server, is different to running
it as a workstation. I know that in many cases the distinction between
server and workstation is blurred, but the administration of a dedicated
server supporting a great number of users, serving web pages, etc, is
different to a machine being used by someone manipulating images with
'The GIMP'.


The roll of an organisation such as the  Society of Linux Professionals
will/ should advocate the testing of its members to a recognised standard
and issue a certificate to acknowledge the achievement of that level of
skill, knowledge, experience, etc.

The time is right for the creation of such a Society and the values that
it upholds, the product that we all endear so much is sufficiently mature
enough to satisfy the requirements of many, if not most, commercial,
home, school & other uses that desktop and server computers are put to.

I for one would jump at the chance to be a CLP and help promote the use
of Linux and Other Open Source applications and utilities.

Regards Navarre

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 5/23/02, 7:03:06 PM, skribe <skribe at amber.com.au> wrote regarding Re:
[plug] Professional Linux Organisation:


> Society of Linux Professionals (West Aust.)
> Then you could be a Certified Linux Professional

> Personally if this thing is going to have any real meaning then we need
to
> look at a global organisation with established local chapters. YMMV.

> skribe
> --
> Public key information available at:
> http://www.amber.com.au/~skribe/publickey.html
> Key fingerprint = A855 9CA3 953B 5195 C518  12F2 0E05 DCCD 5A88 E8A4

> Atlanta:
>       An entire city surrounded by an airport.