SPAM and archives (Was: Re: [plug] PHP question..)
Ben Jensz
jensz at wn.com.au
Thu Jul 3 11:45:49 WST 2003
Paul Wilson wrote:
>
>How do you propose to do this? Bearing in mind the difficulty of getting the
>international community to agree on serious and life-threatening issues,
>getting a 100% concensus on legislation to outlaw spam is a complete non
>starter. As the US has shown, even defining spam is proving difficult.
>
>
Simple, its any unsolicited email that is sent out for commercial
purposes. That is what 99% of the spam I receive is.
>Yes, it *would* be nice to stop it at source, but I can't see it happening. It
>would also be nice for house break-ins to stop, but that's not likely either.
>
>
But breaking into peoples houses IS illegal. If you make sending out
spam email illegal, it won't stop it from happening, but it will reduce it.
Anyway, getting off topic here. The issue is the PLUG archive and the
fact that it has full email addresses listed in it ripe for harvesting.
/ Ben
More information about the plug
mailing list