[plug] Controversial comparison of distros?
James Devenish
devenish at guild.uwa.edu.au
Mon Oct 27 17:15:03 WST 2003
In message <20031027090110.GA6192 at erdos.home>
on Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 05:01:10PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> Although version numbers are arbitrary anyway.
Here is a comparison I did in February between vendor conventions and
their possible consequences if used for the naming of future versions of
Mac OS X (Sun is know for letting its marketing dictate its versioning):
Solaris 8 SunOS 5.8
=> Mac OS X 3 Darwin 10.3
Java 2 Software Development Kit 1.4.1_01
=> Mac OS X 4 Darwin Kernel Version 7.2.1_03
Microsoft Word 2000 (9.0.3821 SR-1)
=> Mac OS XP 2003 (7.1.1739 SR-1)
OSF1 V5.1F (Rev. 2650)
=> MacOSX3 V7.2F (Rev. 1739)
HP-UX spe169 B.11.11 U 9000/800 1939057856
=> #(@()NOCARRIER
_______________________________________________
plug mailing list
plug at plug.linux.org.au
http://mail.plug.linux.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug
More information about the plug
mailing list