[plug] Controversial comparison of distros?
Cameron Patrick
cameron at patrick.wattle.id.au
Tue Oct 28 16:56:31 WST 2003
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:21:47PM +0800, James Devenish wrote:
| I think the distinction (a meaningful one) is whether the application is
| included in the operating system or not.
Fair enough. In that case, whether or not a given application is
considered "core" depends on the distribution - and even on the
particular version of a distribution. Debian, for instance, appears to
make a concerted effort to package every piece of software that it is
legally able to. Other distros adopt a more moderate approach.
A lot of people (e.g. those coming from Windows-land) would likely
consider the software included in even a less "shovelware"-prone distro
as inappropriate for a "core" operating system.
In BSD-ish systems there's a nice neat distinction between the OS
(kernel+userland) and extra software (ports). This is much blurrier
when you're talking about Linux-y systems. Another observation is that
the amount of software included with operating systems has grown
steadily with time - compare MS-DOS with Windows XP, or early versions
of Slackware with Debian.
I'm not quite sure where I'm heading with all that so I think I'll stop
rambling now...
| The idea of non-interactive postinst scripts is great when you are
| dealing with "zero installation" consumers, but doesn't translate
| well to sysadmins.
(Perhaps that sentence could have ended at "great"? The zillions of
debconf messages---and worse, random interactive prompts from
non-debconf-using packages---is one of the more annoying 'features' of
Debian.)
| > Exactly. And as such, they make different packaging decisions based on
| > the appropriateness for a particular target audience or purpose.
|
| I like Solaris, Tru64 and OpenBSD.
...your point being what, exactly? That you shouldn't really be on this
list at all? :-P (Or am I just being dense and missing humour/incisive
observation?)
Cheers,
Cameron.
_______________________________________________
plug mailing list
plug at plug.linux.org.au
http://mail.plug.linux.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug
More information about the plug
mailing list