[plug] Mail Server/Gateway (Min Specs, other feedback)
shayne at guild.murdoch.edu.au
Thu Jun 10 20:34:06 WST 2004
For what its worth, I replaced dovecot after the older one (cant remember)
went...... stupid in the head policy wise.... and its been an absolute
"the vast majority of Iraqis want to live in a peaceful, free world. And
we will find these people and we will bring them to justice."
George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Oct. 27, 2003
Shayne O'Neill. http://www.perthimc.asn.au
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Leon Blackwell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 07:06:54PM +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote:
> > > > Others here seem to like Dovecot.
> > > Unfortunately, not in debian at all.
> > Not in woody. Definitely in sarge & sid.
> Okay, I did miss that (somehow miss typed it with apt-cache policy).
> The problem is that sid is just not stable enough to use on a production
> server, and sarge's method of update results in a lack of prompt
> security fixes. For example, subversion in sarge has known security
> issues at the moment. The only way to resolve these issues is to
> upgrade to the version in sid -- but this is not always possible.
> Debian/stable is the only distribution that is predictble, stable and
> has prompt security updates.
> There does appear to be an unofficial backport:
> points you to
> but it is a version behind the one in testing/unstable, leaving me
> wonder how dedicated the backporters are (the only set of backports I've
> found to be really well done are the bunk-1 and bunk-2 sets).
> Leon Blackwell | When you have to kill a man it costs
> http://www.lostrealm.com/ | nothing to be polite.
> jabber:lionfire at lostrealm.com | -- Sir Winston Churchill
> PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.linux.org.au
> Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au
More information about the plug