[plug] Online music services and Linux?
Mr Shayne
shayne at guild.murdoch.edu.au
Tue Aug 23 13:00:59 WST 2005
I suspect if the bogus copyright regime toppled, the thinking would be
different, as it would move "IP" from a matter of legality to a matter of
reputation. "Sure you can sell that product, but it would be nice if we
had the code you dodgy operator you."
Either way, I have huge problems with bootlegging local band music. I know
full well that when you buy a CD off a band at the pub, thats 20 bucks
that goes smack bang into paying off the recording studio and ultimately
dinner for the drummers 9 kids (uh, catholic rock band I suppose?! I'm
being rhetorical). If you make a copy for yourself, you are still not
stealing , but its still the right thing to do.
Buying a $30 CD off Metallica doesnt mean metallica gets $30 however, and
either way, its not as if they NEED the money.
But if you are planning to set up a factory to produce metallica bootlegs,
then yes, you probably need to go to jail or something.
--
Freedom's just another word for something new to regulate
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Alex Nordstrom wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:08, simon wrote:
>> ditto. It amazes me how liberal some people are with violating other
>> people's rights (after all, they have the right to distribute their
>> music or whatever in any way they wish - if you dont like the terms,
>> dont buy it). However, their stories change when it comes to the GPL
>> and OSS (which must be afforded every protection under the law and
>> anyone who violates the license is pure evil).
>
> I have to admit I find it strange in more than one way to compare
> subjective impressions of the reactions of some hypothetical,
> homogeneous GPL collective to personal-use copyright infringements
> vis-a-vis what usually amounts to taking credit for the work of others
> for commercial profit.
>
> --
> Alex Nordstrom
> http://lx.n3.net/
> Please do not CC me in followups; I am subscribed to plug.
>
More information about the plug
mailing list