[plug] SAN Advice

[Mark Slatem]

Paul,

Thanks for the advice and the link you provided. The inquirer url shows
the exact device we have been quoted on, the given price includes 1 x
100GB and 6 x 750GB Seagate SATA Drives. At the moment we are undecided
on the SAN VS NAS, what is your opinion on both considering we want to
run virtual machines on them. Also if we went for the "Intel Storage
Creek 2" what OS flavor would you recommend?

Mark.

  

On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 08:33 +0800, Paul Antoine wrote:

> Mark,
> 
> Do you need a SAN or a NAS?
> 
> The info I have seems to indicate that you could run Linux on the Intel 
> box if you wished as it's really just a server with lots of drive bays 
> at the front :-)
> 
> Does the $10,000 include any drives?  Is it the version with the RAID 
> controller?
> 
> Here's a link to the release from the Inquirer:
> 
> http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2007/04/16/intel-updates-storage-offerings
> 
> Hope this helps,
> P.
> 
> BTW: I pointed my friend Casper at the Drobo, which runs Linux.  They 
> are apparently producing an gigabit ethernet version to compliment the 
> current USB2.0 version which has had good reviews. Casper contacted 
> Drobo about an Australian distributor - they said they're working on a 
> 240v version to satisfy global requirements. http://www.drobo.com
> 
> Silly American companies often save a few $$s by putting in a 110v only 
> switchmode PSU...  always bites them in the bum by delaying time to 
> market elsewhere in the world.
> 
> 
> Mark Slatem wrote:
> > Hey all, I have been tasked with finding some sort of storage solution 
> > that will be going into a rack. The primary use will be to host virtual 
> > machines and automate backups from other servers in the racks. I would 
> > like to go with something that does not break the bank, as we are a 
> > small outfit with a budget to match.
> > 
> > I have been given a quote from for a Intel Storage Server "McKay Creek", 
> > for around $10 000 but was horrified to see that its OS is gasp!.... 
> > wait for it "Windows Server 2003 Std".  I cringed in horror when I saw 
> > this,  as  there is  just no way that I am going to trust vital data to 
> > a storage server running "Windows", and I can't understand why they 
> > would choose to bundle this device as they have.
> > 
> > Can anyone recommend a Linux based storage SAN device that would meet my 
> > requirements, or put forth experience in using one.
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.org.au
> > http://www.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/plug
> > Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG discussion list: plug at plug.org.au
> http://www.plug.org.au/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Committee e-mail: committee at plug.linux.org.au


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plug.org.au/pipermail/plug/attachments/20071026/9e50947c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: MarkS-oz.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.plug.org.au/pipermail/plug/attachments/20071026/9e50947c/attachment.png>